If the number input changes while set is low the number will not change and keep outputting the last "set" number.
#LEVEL VIEW LOGICBOTS UPDATE#
Update coming out on early next week that will change the number storage gate and it will behave like this: It will store any number while the set input receives a high input (currently it needs a rising edge signal (low to high)). or else i'm going to need a loooooooot of splitters and a row of stored numbers. if col = 3 target = 270 else if col = 4 target = 315. i don't see how that with the colour number helps me? the only thing i know to do in a situation like this is a bunch of if/else statements.
if the two inputs aren't zero, then add them? then i see there's four input nodes, one at the left of the arrow and one between the arrow and + sign?Īnd. Is there a description for dummies for this one? i'm reading it. yes? when the number changes, does the stored number change? or do i have to do something to the set input node to make it change? If i stick the colour sensor on the input stick. And in many cases you won't know if it is bot/scrapper as UA can be faked.īut yes, if strict enforcement comes from AMP cache implementations along with rate limits, this could work.Okay, i dont fully get the number storage thing or the selective addition gate. However, If scrapper/bot reads from my server I can always introduce rate limits and block access at the webserver (such as apache, ngix) level, because I have visibility and control on who is visiting my problem with robot.txt is, except the top few, I have seldom found bots to respect robot.txt. Note that in case scrapper/bot read amp-caches programmatically, publisher cannot even find a trace (as javascript based analytics won't work, and server logs are not available at publishers end.). So workable solution is a intermediate service (from cache provider) which first validates legitimate calls and then only allow contents to be fetched rather than content is fetched from cache and browser(viewer) validating if a legitimate call?Not sure how reCaptcha will work in AMP.Īlso server side rate limits are also desired if in case scrapper abuse faster than before availability of content. But certainly scrappers find ways to fetch content without comment is worth notable in this regard. Good browsers and people will mostly allow scripts. scrappers and bots are not practically affected by component visibility on UI. Also, you can read more about how AMP cache works at Let me know if that answers your question. I have gone through amp-access docs and found that currently only browser visibility based option is available and server side access control option is still the amp team is planning to add support for recaptcha in AMP as per #2273
Is there a documentation/reference/case where I can find how Google AMP cache or third party cache validates humans vs bots (like reCaptcha).I don't want scrappers and bots (except a few ) to crawl the site or store and re-use content. I am impressed the way AMP contents is delivered, However, as a niche content creator, I am little concerned over the scrapping door the amp caches open up.
(Sorry for not sticking to issue guideline as this was generic concern)
0 kommentar(er)
